The U.S. Supreme Court’s review of Monsanto v. Durnell is not about re-litigating the science of glyphosate. It is about who decides what appears on a federally regulated product label. Our latest analysis examines the oral argument, the legal path before the Court, and why the case could have implications far beyond one herbicide.

“The Court is not being asked to decide whether glyphosate causes cancer. It is being asked who has authority to decide what goes on a federally regulated label.”